Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Appendix G: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Rating of Professionals to Deliver Dietary Counseling
Pages 355-356

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 355...
... . cat clum In women Reducing intake of dietary sodium Increasing intake of dietary iron Increasing intake of beta-carotene and other antioxidants Breastfeeding infants Effectiveness of Counseling Counseling to change dietary habits Specially trained educators Primary care clinicians I, II-2, II-3 II-2 II-2, II-3 II-2 B B B I, II-I, II-2, II-3 B II-3 II-2, II-3, III II-2, II-2 I, II-2 IC III A B C a Quality of evidence: I = evidence obtained from at least one properly randomized 355
From page 356...
... b Strength of Recommendations: A = There is good evidence to support the recommendation that the condition be specifically considered in a periodic health examination; B = There is fair evidence to support the recommendation that the condition be specifically considered in a periodic health examination; C = There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against the inclusion of the condition in a periodic health examination, but recommendations may be made on other grounds; D = There is fair evidence to support the recommendation that the condition be excluded from consideration in a periodic health examination; E = There is good evidence to support the recommendation that the condition be excluded from consideration in a periodic health examination. c These trials generally involved specially trained educators such as dietitians delivering intensive interventions (e.g., multiple sessions, tailored materials)


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.